EU copyright legislation roundup – first trimester of 2024 – Cyber Information

Photograph by Markus Spiske on Unsplash

Welcome to the primary trimester of the 2024 roundup of EU copyright legislation (although with a slight delay)! On this version, we replace you on what has occurred between January and March 2024 in EU copyright legislation. Curiously sufficient, on this subject you’ll find fairly a little bit of UK coverage experiences.

As our common readers know, this roundup collection contains Courtroom of Justice (CJEU) and Normal Courtroom judgments, Advocate Generals’ (AG) opinions, and vital coverage developments. You possibly can learn the earlier roundups right here.



CJEU judgments and AG Opinions


Collective administration in Italy (and never solely) has been a difficult and problematic subject for years. In March, the CJEU held that Italian legislation, prohibiting impartial administration entities established in one other Member State from providing their companies inside Italy is incompatible with the liberty to offer companies as per Article 56 TFEU learn along side Directive 2014/26. Learn extra in regards to the case right here and keep tuned for a forthcoming touch upon this weblog.


GEMA, AG Opinion, C-135/23

In February, AG Szpunar delivered his opinion in GEMA tackling the query of whether or not the set up of TV units with indoor antennas (able to receiving broadcasts) by an operator of a rental condominium constructing is a communication to the general public. The AG concludes that this end result is because of the truth that the act of set up constitutes a “deliberate intervention by the person involved with the goal of giving entry to protected works to individuals who can be unable to take pleasure in them with out that intervention”; as such, this act of installaction is “an act of communication” to the general public


CDSM Directive implementation

Each trimester we hope to delete this part from the roundup, solely to search out out that the subject of the CDSM Directive’simplementation persists. As readers most likely know, Poland is presently the one Member State that has not applied the directive. Earlier this 12 months the brand new Polish authorities proposed controversial implementation of some features of the CDSM, particularly the TDM provisions (see extra right here). Possibly issues will change in three months.

In case you are curious about monitoring the implementation course of, please test the COMMUNIA DSM Implementation Portal.





UKIPO, UK voluntary code of fine apply on transparency in music streaming

In January, the UKIPO issued a code of apply with a dedication to requirements of fine apply in relation to music streaming. Central to the code is a continued dialogue and “clear and clear sharing of related data” in terms of strategies of calculating and reporting revenues and royalties. A number of the signatories embody the British Photographic Trade (BPI), the Affiliation of Unbiased Music (AIM), the Phonographic Efficiency Restricted (PPL) and PRS for Music.

GEMA and SACEM, Joint scientific evaluation of the music sector: AI and music

On 30 January, the German composers, lyricsists publishers gathering society (GEMA) and the French authors, composers and publishers gathering society (SACEM) revealed a commissioned research on genAI and music. The research sheds gentle on the impression of genAI in Germany and France and was carried out by the analysis institute “Goldmedia”.


UK Home of Lords, Giant language fashions and generative AI

In February, the Home of Lords launched a report calling on the UK authorities to deal with the problem of generative AI. On the copyright entrance, the report stresses that the appliance of the legislation to LLM processes is advanced, however the ideas stay clear, particularly “copyright is to reward creators for his or her efforts, stop others from utilizing works with out permission, and incentivise innovation”. The report highlights that “the present authorized framework is failing to make sure these outcomes happen and the Authorities has an obligation to behave. It can not sit on its arms for the following decade till ample case legislation has emerged.”


UKIPO, A professional-innovation strategy to AI regulation: authorities response

As beforehand reported, the UK has been considering a code of apply on copyright and AI, specializing in the enter points. In 2023, the UKIPO convened a working group made up of rights holders and AI builders. On this authorities response to the final subject of AI regulation, it seems that whereas the working group has offered a invaluable discussion board for stakeholders to share their views, in February 2024 it has finally been dissolved because it was not capable of agree an efficient voluntary code.


UKIPO, Rising public perceptions of mental property in UK media

In February, the UKIPO revealed a report on the general public notion of IP in UK media, which was carried out by Hayleigh Bosher (Brunel College London). The principle takeaway seems to be that there’s an rising development in using social media in a strategic method and particularly as “backlash” in opposition to IP rights holders’ enforcement initiatives.


UKIPO, Metaverse experiences – IP and Metaverse and An evaluation of the Metaverse IP panorama

In March 2024, the UKIPO issued two experiences on the metaverse. The primary paints the final image of the rising reputation of the metaverse, which in itself is mirrored in IP traits.These IP traits is usually a helpful proof base to trace rising applied sciences. The second will get extra particular in regards to the varied IPRs (together with infringement, licensing and enforcement points in terms of copyright). It was ready by Dr Gaetano Dimita, Dr Yin Harn Lee, Dr Michaela MacDonald, Dr Anthony Michael Catton, Zeynep Kubra Kavcar Penbegullu, and Juan Alberto Pulido Lock.


European Fee, Advice on measures to fight counterfeiting and improve the enforcement of mental property rights

In March, the European Fee issued a suggestion on measures to fight counterfeiting and improve enforcement of IPRs. The final theme of the advice revolves round encouraging all concerned actors (from nationwide authorities, rightholders, intermediaries and others) to take efficient, applicable and proportionate measures to fight IP infringing actions. Amongst different issues, it encourages forstering cooperation by means of voluntary measures, designating a single contact level for IP enforcement, fostering ADR procesures, benefiting from the brand new applied sciences to struggle IP-infringing actions and others.


European Parliament, AI Act – adopted

The AI Act was lastly adopted by the European Parliament in March 2024. The ultimate textual content and numbering of provisions remains to be not out there, altough what we assume to be a close to last model could be checked right here beneath Modification 808.



Coming quickly and newest referrals

A number of copyright circumstances on communication to the general public are nonetheless pending earlier than the CJEU: AKM (C-290/21) on satellite tv for pc broadcasting, Citadines (C-723/22) on resort and health rooms, HADOPI (C-470/21) on the French HADOPI legislation, GEMA(C-135/23) on condominium buildings, in addition to the newest German referral on retirement properties.

Just a few circumstances are pending on the notion of a piece: Kwantum Nederland and Kwantum België (C-227/23) regarding works of utilized artwork and the Constitution, Mio and Others (C-580/23) on utilized artwork and originality and Institutul G. Călinescu (C-649/23) on the idea of a piece.

As well as, the CJEU will nonetheless must have its last say on the next: Sony Pc Leisure Europe (C-159/23) on recreation consoles and cheat software program, Reprobel (C-230/23) on truthful remuneration and, ONB and Others (C-575/23) on copyright exploitation contracts beneath the CDSM Directive, Pelham (C-590/23) on pastiche, and DADA Music and UPFR (C-37/24) on collective administration, phonogram producers and equitable remuneration.

Keep tuned!

Leave a Comment