How voters’ preferences and coverage priorities have shifted forward of the European elections – Fin Serve

The 5 years because the final European Parliament elections have seen a number of crises, together with the COVID-19 pandemic, the struggle in Ukraine and the associated power disaster. Lorenzo Codogno and Mara Monti write these shocks have prompted modifications within the coverage priorities of each the EU’s establishments and its residents. Nevertheless, whereas a shift to the proper within the European Parliament could not threaten the combination course of as up to now, it might nonetheless undermine the stability wanted to face future challenges.

This text is a part of a collection on the 2024 European Parliament elections. The EUROPP weblog may also be co-hosting a panel dialogue on the elections at LSE on 6 June.

The eminent economist John Maynard Keynes is typically credited with saying, “When the details change, I modify my thoughts. What do you do?” Actuality is notoriously cussed, and so, as Keynes famous, it may be higher to vary our minds if the scenario modifications. That is very a lot what has occurred to European establishments and voters over the previous 5 years.

Political priorities have modified because the 2019 European election due to occasions and the way European policymakers responded to them, from the pandemic to the invasion of Ukraine and the associated power disaster. The rise in power costs impacted the price of dwelling, squeezing family buying energy. It pushed inflation past the European Central Financial institution (ECB) goal, forcing the financial institution to vary financial coverage and improve the price of borrowing.

The U-turn in financial coverage was surprising. In 2019, inflation was under the ECB goal of two%, and actual rates of interest have been in destructive territory, which made for a very totally different financial atmosphere. At the moment, the Eurosceptic events performed a necessary position in criticising European establishments, from Parliament to the central financial institution. After the very important position performed by European establishments in combatting the varied crises over the previous 5 years, they’ve turn out to be considerably much less populist and fewer Eurosceptic. The purpose is not to exit the EU however reasonably to vary it, following the UK’s eye-opening expertise.

Nevertheless, they’re embracing extra excessive far-right concepts. Just lately, the European candidate for the Different für Deutschland (AfD), Maximilian Krah, mentioned in an in terview, “I’ll by no means say that anybody who had an SS uniform was routinely a felony”. Ultimately, he was excluded by his get together from the electoral marketing campaign.

His AfD operating mates in the identical European political grouping, Identification and Democracy (ID) – the one to which Italy’s League and France’s Rassemblement Nationwide belong – issued a observe to announce that they determined “to exclude with quick impact the German AfD delegation”. This was nothing wanting a political earthquake amid the continued re-alignment of coverage priorities on the proper finish of the political spectrum.

Altering priorities

In 2019, the trademark of Ursula von der Leyen’s Fee was local weather transition. The pandemic delayed this precedence after which the Russian invasion, and now it appears prefer it has been considerably downplayed. But, Brussels’ view is that backtracking can be a mistake and a catastrophe. The issues associated to the social and political dimensions of the inexperienced transition must be flexibly managed sooner or later to permit supply, because it has turn out to be not solely an crucial to save lots of the planet but additionally a competitiveness problem.

Leaving apart that, the EU focus is steadily shifting in direction of (1) safety/defence and financial safety (which additionally consists of industrial coverage) and (2) competitiveness (methods to deal with the long-term challenges for the EU economic system). Frequent EU funding can also be very a lot on the potential future agenda if politically supported by the following Fee/European Parliament.

Repeating the NextGenerationEU plan can be nearly unimaginable legally. Nonetheless, there could also be widespread funding for the low-hanging fruit of defence spending, which has turn out to be a topical problem in Brussels. It will likely be on the consideration of the brand new School of Commissioners quickly, as the brand new Fee should put together the controversy for the brand new Multiannual Monetary Framework (MFF) in mid-2025.

The dramatic change in priorities and attitudes is especially associated to the geopolitical scenario, particularly in areas the place EU scale is an added worth and defence/safety comes on the high. This might solely be amplified by the forthcoming US presidential elections. Lastly, geopolitical occasions have moved enlargement again to the forefront of the EU agenda, together with the accession course of for Ukraine and Moldova. No accession is anticipated by 2029, however the course of wants to begin instantly if the EU needs to carry it ahead.

It’s laborious to imagine that the projected shift to the proper within the European Parliament (Determine 1) would considerably change the constructive angle in direction of European integration and a kind of “closing of ranks” to face international challenges. The normal Euroscepticism of right-leaning events has shifted because the geopolitical atmosphere has modified. But, there could also be some issues.

Determine 1: Present and projected composition of the European Parliament

Supply: European Parliament, Wiki, authors’ calculations. Common of the most recent six opinion polls.

On condition that coalitions are variable geometries within the European Parliament relying on the problem, a shift of the pivotal get together from Renew Europe to the European Folks’s Get together (Determine 1) and a extra vital position performed by the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) could effectively have penalties for the insurance policies historically supported by the Social Democrats, the Greens, and Renew Europe, resembling local weather transition, migration insurance policies and the only market, that are essential for financial integration.

Voters are additionally calling for a shift in focus

Insurance policies will not be the one factor that has modified: voters’ priorities have additionally shifted and doubtless for a similar causes. After the pandemic, public well being turned one of many essential points for Europeans, in addition to assist for the economic system and job creation. The combat in opposition to poverty and exclusion has additionally gained significance over the previous 5 years (Figures 2 and three).

Determine 2: Coverage priorities forward of the 2019 elections

Supply: Eurobarometer, authors’ calculations.

Determine 3: Coverage priorities forward of the 2024 elections

Supply: Eurobarometer, authors’ calculations.

Help for the economic system

The Eurobarometer Countdown to the European Elections (Spring 2024) confirmed that essentially the most vital concern for European residents was the “combat in opposition to poverty and social exclusion”, adopted by “public well being” and “the EU’s defence and safety”.

Issues about poverty and social exclusion are carefully linked to the price of dwelling disaster skilled within the latest previous, as a earlier Eurobarometer survey within the EU areas indicated. In reality, the power disaster and the associated ECB price rises, which affected mortgages and financial institution loans, considerably impacted voters’ priorities.

It has pushed renewed calls for by many Europeans for extra autonomy for the EU within the fields of business and power. Europe created the REPowerEU initiative to speed up the transition to sustainable and cheaper power and cut back dependency on Russia. In accordance with the identical report, 35% mentioned the plan was “pretty efficient”, whereas 13% mentioned it was “very efficient”. Nevertheless, about as many respondents have been unimpressed with REPowerEU, with 30% saying it was “not very efficient” and 15% saying it was “under no circumstances efficient”.

Safety and defence

Important variations occurred throughout the EU areas in safety and defence. Within the south of Europe, international locations like Italy, Spain, Portugal and Greece selected the financial scenario and unemployment as crucial subjects. Within the areas nearer to the EU’s extra delicate exterior borders – international locations like Denmark, the Czech Republic, Germany, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Netherlands, Finland and Sweden – the highest precedence was given to the EU’s safety and defence coverage.

Public well being and the COVID-19 disaster

The problem of “public well being”, a precedence for a lot of residents after the COVID-19 disaster, was chosen by the biggest share of respondents, and it’s the top-ranking problem in Eire, Greece, Spain, Portugal, France, Italy, Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia.

The EU arrange a restoration plan (NextGenerationEU) to answer the financial results of the pandemic and modernise the EU’s economic system by investing over €800 billion (of which about €450 billion will seemingly be used). Virtually half of these responding mentioned the plan was efficient in serving to to sort out the challenges, with 10% seeing it as “very efficient” and 39% “pretty efficient”. The proportion doubting its effectiveness was considerably decrease as compared, with 28% saying the plan was “not very efficient” and 13% that it’s “under no circumstances efficient”.

Local weather change

The combat in opposition to poverty and social exclusion got here high in France, Croatia, Bulgaria, Greece, Spain, Portugal, Latvia and Lithuania, with different necessary points resembling “local weather change” scoring (27%), “migration” (24%), “democracy and the rule of regulation” (23%). Local weather change points have been on the high of the rating in Denmark, France, the Netherlands, Austria, Finland and Sweden. Nonetheless, in comparison with the earlier election, it has slipped from 43% final time to 27% as a precedence for European residents.

Europe’s reply to the local weather disaster was the European Inexperienced Deal, which aimed to sort out local weather change and remodel the EU right into a aggressive, clear and climate-neutral economic system by 2050. Nevertheless, based on the Eurobarometer, just one in ten respondents throughout the EU mentioned that the European Inexperienced Deal was “very efficient” in serving to to sort out the challenges confronted by the EU, although 34% described the plan as “pretty efficient”. Nevertheless, a better quantity have been dissatisfied with its affect: 17% judged it “under no circumstances efficient”, and 33% mentioned it was “not very efficient” of their responses.


The subsequent points are “democracy and rule of regulation” (23%) and “migration” (24%): the latter, particularly, has moved down the rating, implying many Europeans are just a little extra relaxed in regards to the topic or that different points have turn out to be extra vital. As compared, 44% positioned the problem on the high in 2019.

Nevertheless, the variety of international locations that rank it on the high stays giant: Germany, Belgium, Denmark, the Czech Republic, Eire, Cyprus, Malta, Netherlands, Austria and Finland. The international locations the place it has dropped down the agenda as a priority are Italy, Hungary, Greece and Spain.

Higher protected than sorry?

On this 12 months’s European Parliament elections, residents from 27 EU international locations will vote to form the bloc’s insurance policies on local weather and power, defence and safety, migration and plenty of different areas. The composition of the European Parliament will form establishments and decide programmes and insurance policies.

The EU has made substantial steps in integration through the present parliament (NextGenerationEU, but additionally the joint buy of vaccines, a platform for joint buy of fuel and different actions). Different areas the place the EU wants scale might be the following frontier for integration. Precedence goes to safety and defence in parallel with economics, however it’s unclear whether or not concrete new initiatives will develop quickly.

A coherent coverage combine to handle all the problems concurrently and have all the pieces transferring in the identical path at a sure pace stays the goal. Ideally, the brand new give attention to defence and safety ought to come together with the area of financial integration and social cohesion, and a high-level compromise ought to deal with the present political divisions.

However there are various obstacles alongside the highway. A extra fragmented European Parliament and a shift of its pivotal level in direction of the proper could not threaten the combination course of, as used to occur up to now. Nonetheless, it could undermine the mix between defence/safety priorities and financial/social cohesion essential to face future challenges.

Be aware: This text provides the views of the authors, not the place of EUROPP – European Politics and Coverage or the London Faculty of Economics. Featured picture credit score: Alexandros Michailidis /

Leave a Comment