Nicholls v Mapfre. The Courtroom of Attraction takes an ‘intertwinedness’ strategy to “proof and process” in Rome II. – Fin Serve

Nicholls & Anor v Mapfre Espana Compania De Seguros Y Reaseguros SA [2024] EWCA Civ 718 is the unsuccessful enchantment towards Sedgwick v Mapfre Espana Compania De Seguros Y Reaseguros Sa [2022] EWHC 2704 (KB) which I focus on right here and towards Nicholls v Mapfre and Sonia Woodward v Mapfre [2023] EWHC 1031 (KB) which … Read more

First AG Szpunar in HUK-Coburg. Accurately imo opines that the pursuit of particular person pursuits could (however not readily) qualify as overriding obligatory regulation, Rome II. – Cyber Information

First Advocate Common Szpunar Opined final week in Case C-86/23 E.N.I., Y.Ok.I. v HUK-COBURG-Allgemeine Versicherung AG – let’s name that case HUK-Coburg. The case issues the applying of Article 16 Rome II’s lois de police aka lois d’software immédiate aka overriding obligatory provisions. A declare is issued for compensation submitted by non-public people, who’re Bulgarian nationals, in accordance … Read more

x